NASDAQ·US·REIT - Office
BXPBXP
Banks, insurers and REITs need specialised metrics
Our model uses general-purpose pillars (FCF, EBITDA, debt ratios) that don't fully capture financial-sector economics like Tier-1 capital, NIM, or loan-loss reserves. Read the score directionally, not as gospel.
สรุป
ควรหลีกเลี่ยง
Today's session
ถือ
What investors notice
Key signs
Plain-language read of the metrics that matter most for this stock.
Strengths
- Modestly undervalued vs. consensus FV20%
- High FCF yield9%
Risks
- Inconsistent profitability4/10
- EPS shrinking on a 5-year basis-31%
- Highly leveraged (Net Debt > 4× EBITDA)13.4×
- Operating profit barely covers interest1.2×
- ROIC below WACC — destroying value-2%
Watchlist
- Gross margins under pressure
- Long-term debt rising — monitor leverage
1Y · period change vs 2025-04-29
Score history (10y)
How quality has trended through cycles.
Verdict bands: 85+ Wonderful · 70 Solid · 55 Average · 40 Risky.
Fair value range
3 of 5 models · trimmed-mean consensus
Open the Fair Value tab to tweak WACC and growth, and to see all five model outputs side-by-side.
10-year financials
Annual revenue, profit, and free cash flow with year-over-year growth overlay.
YoY growth overlaid
Snapshot
At a glance
Top-line figures most investors check first.
Last updated 4/30/2026, 5:19:50 AM · Data via Yahoo Finance, FMP, EDGAR. Disclaimer